Wednesday, January 14, 2015

The Tempest: An Experiment in Mixed Conventions

           When delving into classic, Western literature, it is often comforting to group the works we read under broad labels. Doing so ensures a sense of distinction between works of different cultural movements and stylistic elements. Of course, the scholarly community has the most influence when it comes to categorizing such precious literature. In the case of classifying William Shakespeare’s The Tempest, critics are entangled in a four-rope tug-of-war pulling in the directions of classical tragedy, medieval tragedy, renaissance tragedy, and romance. While most of the evidence would point to The Tempest as being a romantic work, to cast aside the presence of classical tragedy in this play for a single, clear label is to ignore the driving force that initiated the plot.
            Perhaps the most striking element that Shakespeare borrows from classical tragedy in this play is the tragic flaw. The one error that ultimately causes a character’s collapse, the tragic flaw in The Tempest takes the form of selfishness. Prospero, the protagonist of the story, is guilty of this flaw. When recounting his past to Miranda, Prospero recollects, “The government I cast upon my brother / And to my state grew stranger, being transported / And rapt in secret studies” (Act I, Scene II). When he was the Duke of Milan, he lost interest in his responsibilities as the duke in favor of practicing his magical powers, his “secret studies.” During this time, his brother Antonio, in concert with Alonso, overtake the dukedom. Prospero exhibits selfishness by neglecting his role as a leader and instead indulging in his own passion for magic. Eventually, this self-indulgence catches up to him and he loses his position of power entirely.

            Although the romantic tragedy might serve as the dominant organizing principle, the story’s plot ultimately derives from the fact that Prospero had a tragic flaw that resulted in his exile. Observing this play through just a romantic lens blinds us to this truth because typically “In tragedies, characters are destroyed as a result of their own actions and choices; in Romance, characters respond to situations and events rather than provoking them” (Schwartz). Conventionally speaking, the tragic flaw is an element that does not pertain to Romance. Therefore, we can accept that Prospero’s tragic flaw exists only when we recognize the coexistence of romantic tragedy and classic tragedy within this play.
Works Cited
Schwartz, Debora B. "Romance (Tragi-comedy)." California Polytechnic State University, n.d. Web. 14 Jan. 2015.
Shakespeare, William. N.p.: n.p., n.d. The Tempest. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Web. 12 Jan. 2015.

1 comment:

  1. (This is Casey)
    Great post Marcus. I also thought that "The Tempest" should be considered a classic tragedy because the tragic flaw of Prospero starts the initial conflict of the plot. For instance, we would identify cars based on fundamentals like having engines, wheels, and being grounded, but not based on where the car goes or if the car has a spoiler or not. Since "The Tempest" is based on the fundamental fatal flaw of Prospero, the fact that the plot contains a romantic relationship between Ferdinand and Miranda is irrelevent to determining the genre because the tragic flaw of Prospero is the fundamental basis of that same plot. I think that your explanation of the point about the tragic flaw is very good. Great job!

    ReplyDelete